The principle is the same, just that the way you show is far more professional. The copper will squash and form to the shape and space between the head and the sleeve. For example if the one side of the sleeve is 0.1mm lower or higher than the other side, the copper ring/wire will squash to form a perfect seal. On my block I notices that the sleeve is some places was slightly proud, but still way below max spec and other places were flush or a fraction below the height of the block. The stainless shimstock I used ( used stainless due to its high melting point, and that they didn't have stock of copper shimstock ) i cut into rings that sat perfectly on top of the sleeves. I lay them on the sleeve tops and placed the head on carefully to ensure that the rings don't move at all. This creates a perfect seal between the head and the gasket and a perfect seal between the head gasket onto the stainless ring and the sleeve. If I recall correctly, I didn't use the thinnest head gasket, and was working on the principle that there was more "spongyness" in the thicker head gasket and that with the massive torque on the head this would give a better squeeze onto the rings and sleeve tops.
I have since done 65 000 Km and service EVERY 5000Km on this motor. I don't play silly buggers when I drive, I work the motor..... I don't abuse the motor, but I use that 4.2L like it should be used, and whether loaded to 3.5ton pushing through Botswana snotty mud in the pans, or through the snow in Lesotho, that motor chugga chugga's like a sweet kitten purring with laryngitis.......
Would I Piano wire the block over putting the rings on...... yip that's a much better way to do it. My way was a little cruder and cheaper, but done properly the effect is the same. I recon that motor of mine will still comfortably do 500 000Km!!