Re: NOROC: Strategic Session on the "Way Forward": 2017-01-1
Posted: 24 Jan 2017 17:58
Thanks George.
Let me start off by saying that everything I have posted so far has not been an attack on any individual, the committee or its members. They have been hard questions that clearly need asking as the impression I have personally got as a Newby is that there is a lack of transparency. Not a lack of commitment or integrity.
There is clearly still a problem as the first poll showed a 73% interest in Noroc which has swung to 71% no longer in favour ie. unless something is done NOROC is unlikely to survive or have a membership which is so small as to be inconsequential.
With regards to my 2 specific questions;
- The impression I got at the meeting was that the submission made to Nissan was on behalf of NOROC. I did not realise it was an individuals submission so either the impression created was incorrect or I was not listening properly.
- With regards to financial considerations etc at the time of the meeting I was totally unaware of any. However started to hear "rumours" from different people and as I hate rumours I asked the question. My personal opinion is if there are any financial links it just needs to be made public and if there are none also made public. Simple as that and the committee and membership can decide what is appropriate or not. Unfortunately "I do not know and please phone so and so" does not do it for me. The committee should be fully informed and be transparent on the subject.
This will be my final post on the matter as I am one of the 71% that has voted no so this discussion now becomes irrelevant to me for the moment.
Let me start off by saying that everything I have posted so far has not been an attack on any individual, the committee or its members. They have been hard questions that clearly need asking as the impression I have personally got as a Newby is that there is a lack of transparency. Not a lack of commitment or integrity.
There is clearly still a problem as the first poll showed a 73% interest in Noroc which has swung to 71% no longer in favour ie. unless something is done NOROC is unlikely to survive or have a membership which is so small as to be inconsequential.
With regards to my 2 specific questions;
- The impression I got at the meeting was that the submission made to Nissan was on behalf of NOROC. I did not realise it was an individuals submission so either the impression created was incorrect or I was not listening properly.
- With regards to financial considerations etc at the time of the meeting I was totally unaware of any. However started to hear "rumours" from different people and as I hate rumours I asked the question. My personal opinion is if there are any financial links it just needs to be made public and if there are none also made public. Simple as that and the committee and membership can decide what is appropriate or not. Unfortunately "I do not know and please phone so and so" does not do it for me. The committee should be fully informed and be transparent on the subject.
This will be my final post on the matter as I am one of the 71% that has voted no so this discussion now becomes irrelevant to me for the moment.