Page 31 of 55
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 09 Mar 2016 17:18
by Alex Roux
ricster wrote:Loooooong story short, 2002 and 2003 births are problematic as some info was damaged a while back with flood damage. so the docs Lianna had to fill out will definitely help to speed up the process, as this seems to be the docs that are missing from my sons file.
The now new love of my life, Alta ... is willing to go the extra mile to ensure if I email her a copy of the forms Lianna filled in ( seeing as Mr Arri Gant refused point blank ... and it was even a battle to get a photo copy of the document), she will see what she can do for me to push the process forward.
No friggen wonder!!!
Of our three children, the one without the unabridged, having waited not for more than 5 months, was born in 2003.
So if no data, they just sit on the blooming applications and do nothing, cause they do not know what to do?....Until you get hold of good old Alta.
She is going to get busy tomorrow.
I need to get hold of this Alta lady and do the whale sounds thing for Marietjie.
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 09 Mar 2016 17:19
by bogeyman
Alex,
I tried twice , but the system was not operational , and with my work and my wife working for at a law firm , getting both of us to a working home affairs office together is proving problematic. Better chance of getting pregnant without a bridge.
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 09 Mar 2016 18:24
by offroadbiker
Cedric I completed and handed in those 2 forms yesterday and mailed copies to some dude today so lets see.
The lady at Krugersdorp is willing to give me a letter next week if no certificate.
I am going throgh the process with my fellow Patrollers as a sign of brotherhood

Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 09 Mar 2016 18:30
by SJC
Tinus lotz wrote:Jules daar gaan mobile toilets wees en ons het water daar ....
Is dit dan nie nodig om ekstra water saam te bring vir stort nie?
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 09 Mar 2016 18:50
by SJC
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 09 Mar 2016 21:03
by Tinus lotz
SJC wrote:Tinus lotz wrote:Jules daar gaan mobile toilets wees en ons het water daar ....
Is dit dan nie nodig om ekstra water saam te bring vir stort nie?
Nee ons sal reg wees
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 10 Mar 2016 09:06
by ricster
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 10 Mar 2016 11:16
by Alex Roux
Just ot check
Do we know for certian whether the unabridged is necessary, even if both parents travel with the child, and the child has his own passport and normal birth certifcate?
If so, and if all else fails, we will need to be both parents at the HA office to apply for the letter stating that we did apply for the thing.
Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 10 Mar 2016 11:31
by Tinus lotz
Alex Roux wrote:Just ot check
Do we know for certian whether the unabridged is necessary, even if both parents travel with the child, and the child has his own passport and normal birth certifcate?
If so, and if all else fails, we will need to be both parents at the HA office to apply for the letter stating that we did apply for the thing.
Dude you need it its gets complicated if only one parent is present....every one things every one is ubducting children. ....

Re: Trip 2 - SWAZILAND 18-21 March 2016
Posted: 10 Mar 2016 13:15
by ricster
Alex Roux wrote:Just ot check
Do we know for certian whether the unabridged is necessary, even if both parents travel with the child, and the child has his own passport and normal birth certifcate?
If so, and if all else fails, we will need to be both parents at the HA office to apply for the letter stating that we did apply for the thing.
From what I understand, but like Dirk has mentioned, it seems to vary from office to office....

.... for us, it is like the application process for the unabridged, only one parent needed to be there. She did have certified copies of both our ID's and certified copy of original Birth Certificate..... but they didn't want to give us the letter saying that the letter was only valid for the December period. Its all a mish mash it seems so it would be better to try both be there. Maybe an affidavit stating that the one parent cannot be there due to "whatever reasons" ( read - use lots of imagination ), then a letter also certified by the police written by the " absent " parent stating that you give full permission to the other parent to apply for the Illusive Authorization Letter, or what ever document is required.